HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:08:57 GMT Server: Apache Set-Cookie: NYT-S=deleted; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/; domain=www.stg.nytimes.com Set-Cookie: NYT-S=0Mag8qcvAvSgvDXrmvxADeHIMIQZv/thN9deFz9JchiAIUFL2BEX5FWcV.Ynx4rkFI; expires=Mon, 27-Oct-2014 16:08:57 GMT; path=/; domain=.nytimes.com Location: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/business/overly-aggressive-pitches-can-put-off-consumers.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0 Content-Length: 0 nnCoection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache Cache-Control: no-cache Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:08:57 GMT X-Varnish: 61351190 61343999 Age: 125 Via: 1.1 varnish X-Cache: HIT X-API-Version: 5-5 X-PageType: article nnCoection: close 002382
http://nyti.ms/YqwXZi
- Charles M. Blow
- David Brooks
- Frank Bruni
- Roger Cohen
- Gail Collins
- Ross Douthat
- Maureen Dowd
- Thomas L. Friedman
- Nicholas Kristof
- Paul Krugman
- Joe Nocera
- Charles M. Blow
- David Brooks
- Frank Bruni
- Roger Cohen
- Gail Collins
- Ross Douthat
- Maureen Dowd
- Thomas L. Friedman
- Nicholas Kristof
- Paul Krugman
- Joe Nocera
People like to associate with brands that reflect how they see themselves. Thatâs an axiom of advertising. And so we have slogans telling us that âChoosy Moms Choose Jif.â Or, âIf you call yourself a sports fan, you gotta have DirecTV!â
But a study published in the Journal of Consumer Research says ads like these can backfire. Thatâs because such assertive slogans remove a sense of freedom. What if I donât have DirecTV? Are you telling me Iâm not a real sports fan?
âWhen identity is involved, people really want to feel like theyâre making the choice themselves, that the decision is meaningful,â said Amit Bhattacharjee, a visiting assistant professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, who worked on the study with academics from New York University and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. When marketers âpush too hard, it ruins that,â he added. The message âcrowds out a sense of ownership and turns consumers off.â
In the experiment, researchers gathered a group of about 120 people at the University of Pennsylvania. The subjects were encouraged to focus on their environmental interests â a directive meant to activate that part of their identity.
Photo
Credit Michael Waraksa
Then they broke into three groups, with each shown a different slogan for Charlieâs Soap, a real-world, biodegradable cleanser. One group got a message that didnât include any identity reference; it just said the soap was âa good choice for consumers.â Another groupâs message made a light identity reference, calling the soap âa good choice for green consumers.â The third went further: âthe only choice for green consumers!â
What researchers found was that the middle option (âa good choice for green consumersâ) performed best. The worst performer was the ad that called the soap the âonly choiceâ for green consumers.
That result ran counter to the expectations of a panel of 59 marketing executives and managers who had been asked beforehand to predict which slogan would work best. Nearly half projected that the âonly choiceâ slogan would be most effective.
The study subjects reported that the off-putting slogan â with language that was not quite bullying but certainly imperative â threatened their sense of âfreedom in expressing their identity,â Mr. Bhattacharjee said.
The researchers bolstered this conclusion when they ran the experiment a second time, but without telling a new group of subjects to focus on being environmentally conscious. In other words, they werenât primed to identify as green consumers.
In this second experiment, the subjects were equally receptive to all three messages. The result told researchers that consumers who potentially identify with a product are put off by a too-explicit brand message.
The study cited the Jif and DirecTV ads as examples that could be off-putting. But clearly, they donât turn off all consumers. Mr. Bhattacharjee and other scholars said that whatâs probably happening is that while some people may be slightly or even subconsciously irked, they still buy the product because of other attributes, or because of factors like brand loyalty or message frequency.
âAt some nonconscious level, it might be a little annoying or threatening, but put in the overall context, it doesnât necessarily cause defection,â said Mark Forehand, a professor of marketing at the Foster School of Business at the University of Washington, who added that the studyâs overall results made sense.
To Mr. Bhattacharjee, the lesson for marketers is to âreference identity without being too explicit; you do want a lighter touch.â
More on nytimes.com
Site Index

more
{ 0 comments... » Applied Science: Overly Aggressive Pitches Can Put Off Consumers read them below or add one }
Post a Comment