HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:04:37 GMT Server: Apache Set-Cookie: NYT-S=deleted; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/; domain=www.stg.nytimes.com Set-Cookie: NYT-S=0MfiG3ac4UvJzDXrmvxADeHEfNo9oahPxydeFz9JchiAIUFL2BEX5FWcV.Ynx4rkFI; expires=Wed, 29-Oct-2014 02:04:37 GMT; path=/; domain=.nytimes.com Location: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/business/dire-warnings-by-big-tobacco-on-e-smoking-.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0 Content-Length: 0 Cneonction: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache Cache-Control: no-cache Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:04:37 GMT X-Varnish: 1152556068 1152533413 Age: 299 Via: 1.1 varnish X-Cache: HIT X-API-Version: 5-5 X-PageType: article Connection: close 002875
http://nyti.ms/YCsiDH
- Charles M. Blow
- David Brooks
- Frank Bruni
- Roger Cohen
- Gail Collins
- Ross Douthat
- Maureen Dowd
- Thomas L. Friedman
- Nicholas Kristof
- Paul Krugman
- Joe Nocera
- Charles M. Blow
- David Brooks
- Frank Bruni
- Roger Cohen
- Gail Collins
- Ross Douthat
- Maureen Dowd
- Thomas L. Friedman
- Nicholas Kristof
- Paul Krugman
- Joe Nocera
Credit James Nieves/The New York Times
Tobacco companies, long considered public health enemy No. 1, have suddenly positioned themselves as protectors of consumer well-being in the digital age.
They are putting out among the strongest health warnings in the fledgling e-cigarette industry, going further even than the familiar ones on actual cigarettes, a leading cause of death. It has left the industryâs critics scratching their heads and deeply skeptical.
One warning, from Altria, maker of Marlboros, reads in part: âNicotine is addictive and habit forming, and is very toxic by inhalation, in contact with the skin, or if swallowed.â
Another, from Reynolds American, maker of Camels, says the product is not intended for persons âwho have an unstable heart condition, high blood pressure, or diabetes; or persons who are at risk for heart disease or are taking medicine for depression or asthma.â
They appear on the packaging for the companiesâ e-cigarettes, which are part of a fast-growing industry that the tobacco companies are maneuvering to dominate.
The warnings, which are entirely voluntary and are seen by some as attempts to reduce legal liability or burnish corporate reputations, generally exceed what amounts to modest cautions, silence or even positive health claims from smaller e-cigarette makers.
One on a pack of nicotine cartridges for MarkTen e-cigarettes, for instance, the brand Altria is introducing nationwide, runs more than 100 words. People with heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes should not use the product, the label says. Neither should children. It goes on to say that nicotine can cause dizziness, nausea and stomach pains, and may worsen asthma.
âWhen I saw it, I nearly fell off my chair,â said Dr. Robert K. Jackler, a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine where he leads research into cigarette and e-cigarette advertising. MarkTen also warns that e-cigarettes are not a smoking cessation product, a warning that also appears on Vuse from Reynolds.
âIs this part of a noble effort for the betterment of public health, or a cynical business strategy? I suspect the latter,â Dr. Jackler said.
Related Coverage
-
29 States Seek Tighter E-Cigarette RegulationsAUG. 8, 2014
-
The New Smoke: E-Cigarette Makers Are in an Arms Race for Exotic Vapor FlavorsJULY 15, 2014
-
The New Smoke: A Bolder Effort by Big Tobacco on E-CigarettesJUNE 17, 2014
-
The New Smoke: Some E-Cigarettes Deliver a Puff of CarcinogensMAY 3, 2014
Experts with years studying tobacco company behavior say they strongly suspect several motives, but, chiefly, that the e-cigarette warnings are a very low-risk way for the companies to insulate themselves from future lawsuits and, even more broadly, to appear responsible, open and frank. By doing so, the experts said, big tobacco curries favor with consumers and regulators, earning a kind of legitimacy that they crave and have sought for decades. Plus, they get to appear more responsible than the smaller e-cigarette companies that seek to unseat them.
The reason the strategy is low risk, experts said, is that many people donât read the warnings anyway.
But the companies say their reasoning is straightforward. William Phelps, a spokesman for Altria, said the warnings on MarkTen, made by the subsidiary NuMark, reflect âa goal to openly and honestly communicate about health effectsâ and that the warnings are based on âscientific researchâ and âpreviously developed warningsâ on nicotine products. As part of a new national rollout, the MarkTen is in 60,000 stores in the western half of the United States and will be nationwide by yearâs end, the company said.
The R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company, which makes Vuse, had less to say about the origin of its e-cigarette warnings, which note, among other things, that nicotine is addictive and the product should not be used by people with heart conditions or high blood pressure. A company spokesman said the warning reflected the fact that Vuse did not contain tobacco leaf and did not undergo âcombustion,â like tobacco in cigarettes.
In a previous interview with The New York Times, the president of R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company, Stephanie Cordisco, said that her e-cigarette division aimed to make a break with the negative reputation of the cigarette industry. âWeâre here to make sure we can put this industry on the right side of history,â she said in the interview. Reynolds is one of the companies that has sued, successfully, to stop more graphic warnings on cigarette packages.
The fact these companies are voluntarily warning about e-cigarettes is âtotally Orwellian,â said Robert N. Proctor, a Stanford history professor who studies the tobacco industry. He added, âThey do everything for legal reasons, otherwise theyâd stop making the worldâs deadliest consumer products,â he said of tobacco companies.
When it comes to e-cigarettes, public health experts and regulators are struggling with deep contradictions and questions, the most fundamental of which is whether e-cigarettes will lure thousands of cigarette smokers away from a deadly habit or actually lead to a new generation of nicotine addicts.
In a report issued last month, the World Health Organization urged stronger restrictions on e-cigarettes, including indoor smoking bans, and also expressed âgrave concernâ at the growing role of tobacco companies in the industry.
Smaller e-cigarette companies are skeptical too. âTo the uninitiated, it looks like they are responsible corporate citizens,â said Cynthia Cabrera, executive director of the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association, an e-cigarette industry group. She considers the warnings âdisingenuous,â particularly the MarkTen claim that nicotine is âvery toxicâ when inhaled, swallowed or brought into contact with the skin. That is not true of the doses in e-cigarettes, she said.
Ms. Cabrera said she believed that the big tobacco companies had an ulterior motive, perhaps to appear to regulators and lawmakers as more credible than the small e-cigarette companies. She speculated that big tobacco companies would then be able to lobby for rules and laws that would favor them. She said some lobbyists were telling legislators that prepackaged, uniform e-cigarettes had lesser health risks than the ones sold, sometimes in made-to-order fashion, in independent vapor shops. In terms of warnings, Ms. Cabreraâs group has called for childproof packaging on e-liquids, which are used to fill e-cigarettes, and they favor warnings calling nicotine addictive and listing other ingredients.
For now, there are hundreds of smaller e-cigarette companies, many selling online, and their claims and warnings run the gamut. Some make health claims that Dr. Jackler said were wild and unsubstantiated, claiming to be sex stimulants, beneficial for insomniacs or even a way to promote weight loss. Dr. Jackler speculated that one motivation for Big Tobacco could be discouraging smokers from using a competing product.
Mr. Phelps, from Altria, dismissed that idea. âWe want that category to be successful, and NuMark has taken a number of steps to be a leader,â he said.
The warnings on the MarkTen are far more elaborate than those on a pack of Marlboros, which note, for instance, that âsmoking by pregnant women may result in fetal injury, premature birth and low birth weight.â The warning does not include other risks, like the addictive nature of cigarettes, which are known to cause cancer and other deadly diseases. Mr. Phelps said that Altria was putting out cigarette warnings mandated by the government. The government mandate does not, however, preclude stronger warnings from appearing on Marlboros.
Dr. Jackler asked: âWhy wouldnât you warn about âvery toxicâ nicotine on your cigarettes when you do so on e-cigarettes?â
Whatever the warnings say, they are typically disregarded by consumers, according to Allan M. Brandt, professor of the history of medicine and science at Harvard University and an expert in the tobacco industry.
Big tobacco companies âknow that even these types of very serious warnings have generally not put significant dents in their sales,â he said. But, he said, the warnings do appear to be part of an age-old practice by the industry: creating scientific gray areas. That tactic, he said, lets them forestall decisive action by consumers and regulators, as it did with cigarettes. âItâs an incredibly effective and duplicitous practice in inventing additional new uncertainties and, at the same time, appearing to be cooperative,â Mr. Brandt said. âTheyâve done this before,â he added. âIt buys them time. It bought them 40 years with traditional tobacco products.â
More on nytimes.com
Site Index
more
{ 0 comments... » Dire Warnings by Big Tobacco on E-Smoking read them below or add one }
Post a Comment